Searched refs:bi_idx (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
43 unsigned int bi_idx; /* current index into bvl_vec */ member59 #define __bvec_iter_bvec(bvec, iter) (&(bvec)[(iter).bi_idx])104 unsigned int idx = iter->bi_idx; in bvec_iter_advance()120 iter->bi_idx = idx; in bvec_iter_advance()134 if (done == bv[iter->bi_idx].bv_len) { in bvec_iter_advance_single()136 iter->bi_idx++; in bvec_iter_advance_single()153 .bi_idx = 0, \
12 update bi_sector and bi_size, and advance bi_idx to the next biovec. If it18 bi_size and bi_idx have been moved there; and instead of modifying bv_offset32 instead of an integer (that corresponded to bi_idx); for a lot of code the55 it had to walk two different bios at the same time, keeping both bi_idx and89 norm, not all drivers would respect bi_idx and those would break. Now,97 * Almost all usage of bi_idx is now incorrect and has been removed; instead,98 where previously you would have used bi_idx you'd now use a bvec_iter,101 I.e. instead of using bio_iovec_idx() (or bio->bi_iovec[bio->bi_idx]), you
35 idx = iter.bi_idx - 1; in bio_get_last_bvec()37 idx = iter.bi_idx; in bio_get_last_bvec()
264 bio->bi_iter.bi_idx = 0; in bio_init()
1036 bi.bi_idx = 0; in iov_iter_bvec_advance()1039 i->bvec += bi.bi_idx; in iov_iter_bvec_advance()1040 i->nr_segs -= bi.bi_idx; in iov_iter_bvec_advance()
2343 fbio->bi_iter.bi_idx = 0; in sync_request_write()
Completed in 21 milliseconds